Posts Tagged ‘gender identity’

An Open Letter to Legislators and to those Running for the 2010 National Elections

Friday, October 30th, 2009

29 October 2009

Dear Honorable Sir/Madam,

Liberatory and rainbow greetings to you!

I am Bruce Portugal Amoroto, a Filipino gay activist and current President-Coordinator of Philippine Forum on Sports, Culture, Sexuality and Human Rights (TEAM PILIPINAS), Vice-President of Gay and Lesbian Asia Pacific Sport Association (GLISA Asia Pacific), and Asia Pacific Director at Gay and Lesbian International Sport Association (GLISA International). I am also a graduate of the University of the Philippines Diliman and since 2000 I have been involved in the justice and human rights sector particularly on the equal human rights of lesbians, gays, and others.

I am writing to you because I and many other Filipino lesbians, gays, bakla, bantut, bayot, bisexuals, tomboy, transgenders, transsexuals, intersex (LGBTI) and other ’sexual and gender minorities’ (SGMs) in the country are interested in knowing your answer to our question. In your participation in the 2010 National Elections we would like to know sir/madam, what is your platform and programme of action regarding the equal human rights of Filipino lesbians, gays, bakla, bantut, bayot, bisexuals, tomboy, transgenders, transsexuals, intersex (LGBTI) and other ’sexual and gender minorities’ (SGMs) in the country?

According to the Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity that was drafted, discussed, developed and refined by a body of international experts on human rights:
1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
2. All human rights are universal, interdependent, indivisible and interrelated.
3. Sexual orientation and gender identity are integral to every person’s dignity and humanity and must not be the basis for discrimination or abuse.

Sexual orientation is understood to refer to each person’s capacity for profound emotional, affectional and sexual attraction to, and intimate and sexual relations with individuals of a different gender or the same gender or more than one gender.

Gender identity, on the other hand, is understood to refer to each person’s deeply felt internal and individual experience of gender, which may or may not correspond with the sex assigned at birth, including the personal sense of the body (which may involve, if freely chosen, modification of bodily appearance or function by medical, surgical or other means) and other expressions of gender, including dress, speech and mannerisms.

Since 1999, with the help of Akbayan Partylist, Lesbian and Gay Legislative Advocacy Network – Philippines (LAGABLAB-Pilipinas) has pushed for the passage of the Anti-Discrimination Bill (ADB), House Bill 956, in Congress. The ADB is a bill that aims to penalize acts and policies that discriminate on the basis of a person’s perceived or actual sexual orientation and/or gender identity. The ADB does not ask for special rights for Filipino LGBTIs instead it asks for the protection of the equality in dignity, rights and freedoms for the said sector and the provision of the same rights and freedoms accorded by the State to heterosexual and non-transgender/non-transsexual women and men.

In 2004 the Bill was approved at the Lower House but it failed to get a Senate counterpart and has since been pending in Congress due mainly to the strong opposition of the Catholic Church and other conservative and religious groups affiliated with legislators.

In the Philippines, oppression and violence against LGBTIs and other SGMs exists and it is, I believe, much worse compared to countries that criminalize homosexuality because the violence is silent with the discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity hidden and deeply embedded in society’s structure and system. There is only seeming tolerance for us Filipino LGBTIs and other SGMs in fact in our families, homes, communities, churches, work and in society in general, we are still looked at as either immoral, sinful or mentally ill. Many LGBTIs who come out and are out continue to experience vilification, ridicule and bad jokes; others have experienced various levels of discrimination, abuse and violence. In a few Catholic schools there are still policies on masculinity and on same-sex relationships such that students who fail to abide by these rules get kicked out of the institution. There are also private companies, government offices, and establishments that have policies related to the hiring, promotion and firing of employees, the provision of certain benefits, service or product, or dress codes that are oppressive to Filipino LGBTIs. Most of all, we Filipino LGBTIs experience violence from our families and in our homes–there are those who get thrown out and get disowned by their parents for embracing their sexuality and their true selves and there are those who are beaten and physically abused or raped with the consent of their parents who believe that their sons and daughters will be cured and converted into becoming “real men” and “real women”.

In our Constitution there is a provision regarding the Separation of Church and State (Article II Section 6) and yet the Church still finds a way to meddle in public policy. There is also a provision regarding the respect and protection of the equality in dignity, rights and freedoms of each Filipino no matter what status or characteristic they have (Article II Section 11) and yet clearly, Filipino LGBTIs and other SGMs are not treated equally in society. The Constitution is simply not enough to protect the equality of all Filipinos and in the end, only a law can make real and tangible the provisions on the equality in dignity, rights and freedoms of people.

Again, dear sir/madam, in view of the 2010 National Elections, may we know what your platform and programme of action is regarding the equal human rights of Filipino lesbians, gays, bakla, bantut, bayot, bisexuals, tomboy, transgenders, transsexuals, intersex (LGBTI) and other ’sexual and gender minorities’ (SGMs) in the country?

Thank you very much and we hope to hear your full and sincerest answer to our question.

Respectfully,

Bruce Portugal Amoroto
bruce.amoroto@gmail.com

Ang pagbabago ng mga batas kaugnay ng ‘pagiging krimen ng sekswal na pakikipagrelasyon sa kapwa-kasarian’ ay hindi isang “halimbawa ng demokrasya” / Decriminalisation of Homosexuality is not “some kind of democracy”

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

ANG BAGONG PANGULO NG UN ASSEMBLY PRESIDENT AT (ANG PAHAYAG NITO UKOL SA) MGA KARAPATAN NG MGA LGBT
Ang pagbabago ng mga batas kaugnay ng ‘pagiging krimen ng sekswal na pakikipagrelasyon sa kapwa-kasarian’ ay hindi isang “halimbawa ng demokrasya”
26/09/2009

mula sa http://www.ilga.org

Ang ILGA ay matinding nababahala at nagagalit sa pagkukulang ng bagong Pangulo ng UN Assembly na si Ali Abdussalam Treki na isaalang-alang ang pagsasanggalang sa buhay at kaligtasan ng mga tomboy, bakla, trans, intersex at bisexual na tao sa buong mundo bilang isang bagay na kaugnay ng karapatang pantao.

Mr. Ali Treki (left) and UN Secretary-General Mr. Ban Ki-Moon (right)

Mr. Ali Treki (left) and UN Secretary-General Mr. Ban Ki-Moon (right)

Sa isang panayam bago ang kanyang unang talumpati sa UN Assembly sa bago nitong papel bilang Pangulo, idineklara ni Ginoong Treki ang sarili na “talagang hindi pabor” patungkol sa Pahayag na pabor sa ‘pagbabago ng batas na krimen ang sekswal na makipag-relasyon sa kapwa-kasarian’ (decriminalisation of homosexuality) na nilagdaan ng 66 na mga bansa at binasa ng kinatawan ng Argentina noong nakaraang Disyembre sa General Assembly sa New York.

Dagdag pa rito, sinabi ni Ginoong Treki na ang paksang tinutukoy sa nasabing Pahayag, halimbawa na nag pagbabago ng batas kaugnay ng pagiging krimen ng pakikipag-relasyon sa kapwa-kasarian ay “hindi katanggap-tanggap sa maraming bansa sa mundo” at “may iilang mga bansa ang pinahihintulutan ito sa paniniwalang ito ay isang halimbawa ng demokrasya”.

Habang isinasaalang-alang ng Pahayag ang panawagan para sa pandaigdigang pagbabago ng batas kaugnay ng pakikipag-relasyon sa kapwa-kasarian, hindi maiiwasang maipagpalagay ng sinuman na ang bagong Pangulo ay… pabor na gawing mga criminal ang mga taong tomboy at bakla, bisexual, trans at mga intersex. Ang nakababalisa at malubhang kasasapitan ng ganitong pag-uugali, mula sa bagong ulo ng isang institusyon na dapat sana’y nagpapahalaga sa mga karapatan ng tao—ng lahat ng mga karapatan—bilang isang pinakabanal na pinahahalagahan, ay hindi maaaring muli’t muling banggitin.

Nanawagan kami sa mga kinatawan ng mga Estadong lumagda sa Pahayag laban sa pagiging krimen ng sekswal na pakikipagrelasyon sa kapwa-kasarian, pati na rin sa mga bumoto para ihalal si Ginoong Treki sa bago nitong posisyon, na manghingi ng isang paliwanag mula sa Pangulo ng UN Assembly hinggil sa kanyang mga pahayag at magbigay ng tugon rito.

Gloria Careaga & Renato Sabbadini
Co-Secretaries General, ILGA

Para sa karagdagang impormasyon kontakin si: Renato Sabbadini
+32 474 857 950 o renato@ilga.org
Ang ILGA ay isang network ng lampas sa 600 mga grupo mula sa 111 na mga bansa na mula 1978 ay lumalaban para sa pantay na karapatan para sa mga taong tomboy, bakla, bisexual, intersex at transgender.

===

Brussels, 26 September 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

New UN Assembly President Treki’s statements on LGBTI rights
Decriminalisation of Homosexuality is not “some kind of democracy”

ILGA is deeply worried and outraged by UN Assembly new President Ali Abdussalam Treki’s failure to consider the protection of the life and safety of lesbians, gay men, trans, intersex and bisexual people all over the world a matter of human rights.

In an interview prior to his first address to the UN Assembly in his new role, Mr Treki declared himself to be “not in favour at all” with reference to the Statement in favour of the decriminalisation of homosexuality signed by 66 Countries and read by the Argentinian representative last December at
the General Assembly in New York.

Furthermore, Mr Treki said that the matter referred to by the Statement, i.e. decriminalisation, was “not acceptable in the majority of the world” and that “there are some countries that allow that (sic), thinking it is a kind of democracy”.

Considering that the Statement called for the universal decriminalisation of homosexuality, one cannot but conclude that the new President of the UN Assembly is… in favour of criminalising lesbians and gay men, bisexual, trans and intersex people. The worrying and serious implications of this attitude, coming from the new head of an institution which is supposed to regard human rights – all human rights – as the most sacred value, cannot be overstated.

We appeal to the representatives of the States which signed the Statement against criminalisation of homosexuality, but also voted for the election of Mr Treki in his new position, to demand an explanation to the UN Assembly President for his words and react consequently.

Gloria Careaga & Renato Sabbadini
Co-Secretaries General, ILGA

For further information contact: Renato Sabbadini
+32 474 857 950 or renato@ilga.org

ILGA is a network of over 600 groups from 111 countries fighting since 1978 for equal human rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, intersex and transgender people.

Ang mga Prinsipyo ng Yogyakarta / The Yogyakarta Principles

Monday, September 21st, 2009
Yogyakarta Principles

Yogyakarta Principles

ANG MGA PRINSIPYO NG YOGYAKARTA

Ang mga Prinsipyo ng Yogyakarta patungkol sa Paglalapat ng mga Pandaigdigang Batas sa Karapatan ng Tao sa mga usapin ng Oryentasyong Sekswal at Kasariang Pagkakakilanlan

Isang Pangkalahatang-ideya ukol sa mga Prinsipyo ng Yogyakarta

http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/principles_en_overview.htm

Tinutugunan ng mga Prinsipyo ng Yogyakarta ang isang malawak na hanay ng mga pandaigdigang pamantayan ukol sa karapatan ng mga tao at ang mga aplikasyon o paglalapat nito sa mga isyu ng oryentasyong sekswal (sexual orientation) at kasariang pagkakakilanlan (gender identity).

Ang Pangkalahatang-ideyang ito ay nagbibigay ng isang maikling balangkas ng mga Prinsipyo, at ilang mga halimbawa ng kanilang aplikasyon. Mangyaring sumangguni sa mga Prinsipyo para sa isang detalyadong kamalayan sa mga teksto.

Paunang Salita: Sa Paunang Salita kinikilala ang mga paglabag sa mga karapatan ng tao batay sa oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pagkakakilanlan, itinatatag ang mga kaugnay na legal na balangkas, at binibigyang-kahulugan ang ilang susing termino.

Mga Karapatan ukol sa Pandaigdigang Pagtamasa ng mga Karapatan ng Tao, Hindi-Paninino at Pagkakakilanlan sa harap ng Batas: Sa mga Prinsipyo bilang 1 hanggang 3 inilalatag ang mga prinsipyo patungkol sa pandaigdigang bisa ng mga karapatan ng tao at ang aplikasyon ng mga ito sa lahat ng tao nang walang paninino o diskriminasyon, at pati na rin ang karapatan ng lahat ng tao na makilala sa harap ng batas.
Halimbawa:
- Ang mga batas na ginagawang krimen ay pagkagustong sekswal sa kapwa-kasarian o homosexuality ay lumalabag sa pandaigdigang karapatan na hindi masino (desisyon ng UN Human Rights Committee).

Mga Karapatan ukol sa Pantao at Pansariling Seguridad: Tinutugunan ng mga Prinsipyo bilang 4 hanggang 11 ang mga pangunahing karapatan sa buhay, sa kalayaan mula sa karahasan at labis na pagpapahirap, sa privacy, sa pagkamit ng katarungan, at kalayaan mula sa di-makatwirang pagkakakulong.
Mga halimbawa:
- Ang parusang kamatayan ay patuloy na ipinapataw sa consensual na gawaing sekswal sa pagitan ng magkapwa-kasarian na nasa wastong gulang sa kabila ng UN resolution na nagbibigay diin na ang parusang kamatayan ay hindi maaaring ipataw para sa “mga sekswal na relasyon sa pagitan ng parehong husto sa gulang at parehong may pagpayag sa nasabing relasyon.”
- Labing-isang lalake ang inaresto sa isang gay bar at iniligay sa kustodiya ng batas sa loob ng isang taon. Ayon sa hatol ng UN Working Group sa di-makatwirang pagpigil, ang nangyaring pagpigil o detention sa mga tao ay isang paglabag sa mga pandaigdigang batas, at may pagkabahalang pinuna ng grupo na “ang isa sa mga bilanggo ay namatay bilang resulta ng kanyang di-makatarungang pagkakalagay sa detention”.

Mga Pang-ekonomiko, Panlipunan at Pangkultural na mga Karapatan: Inilalatag ng mga Prinsipyo bilang 12 hanggang 18 ang kahalagahan ng di-paninino kaugnay ng pagtatamasa ng mga pang-ekonomiko, panlipunan at pangkultural na mga karapatan, tulad pagkakaroon ng trabaho, tirahan, panlipunang seguridad, edukasyon at kalusugan.
Mga halimbawa:
- Ang mga lesbyana, tomboy at transgender na kababaihan ay higit na nalalagay sa panganib ng paninino/diskriminasyon, kawalan ng tirahan, at karahasan (ulat ng UN Special Rapporteur sa sapat na pabahay).
- Ang mga batang babae na nagpapakita ng pagtingin sa kapwa-kasarian ay nahaharap sa diskriminasyon at pagpapaalis sa kanila mula sa mga institusyong pang-edukasyon (ulat ng UN Special Rapporteur sa karapatan sa edukasyon).
- Ipinahayag ng UN High Commissioner for Human Rights ang kanyang pagkabahala ukol sa mga batas na “nagbabawal ng gender reassignment surgery o mga operasyon kaugnay ng pagpapalit ng ari at kasarian para sa mga transsexuals o yaong mga batas na nangangailangan sa mga taong intersex na sumailalim sa mga operasyong labag sa kanilang mga kagustuhan”.

Karapatan sa Pagpapahayag, Opinyon at Pakikipagsapi: Binibigyang-diin ng mga Prinsipyo bilang 19 hanggang 21 ang kahalagahan ng kalayaang makapagpahayag ng sarili, ng sariling pagkakakilanlan at ng sariling sekswalidad, ng walang panghihimasok ng Estado batay sa oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pakakakilanlan, kabilang na rito ang mga karapatang lumahok ng mapayapa sa mga pampublikong pagtitipon at mga kaganapan at ang pakikisapi sa iba bilang bahagi ng isang komunidad.
Mga halimbawa:
- Ang isang mapayapang pagtitipon upang itaguyod ang pagkakapantay-pantay sa usapin ng oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pagkakakilanlan ay pinagbawalan ng mga awtoridad, at ang mga kalahok ay hinarass, tinakot at pinagbantaan ng kapulisan at mga nasyonalistang panatiko at extremist na sumisigaw ng mga slogan tulad ng “Let’s get the fags” (Puruhin natin ang mga bakla) at “Gagawin namin sa inyo ang ginawa ni Hitler sa mga Hudyo” (ulat ng UN Special Rapporteur ukol sa mga napapanahong porma ng rasismo, paninino batay sa lahi, xenophobia (pagkatakot sa ibang tao o kultura) at mga kaugnay na di-pagpaparaya).

Kalayaan sa Paggalaw at Pagkakaroon ng Asylum (pagpapakupkop sa ibang bayan sa kadahilanang pampulitikal): Itinatampok ng mga Prinsipyo bilang 22 at 23 ang mga karapatan ng tao na magpakupkop sa ibang bayan laban sa pag-uusig na ginagawa sa sariling bayan batay sa oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pagkakakilanlan.
Halimbawa:
- Ang pagsasanggalang sa mga refugee ay dapat na ibinibigay sa mga taong nahaharap sa isang tiyak na pagpapahirap at pag-uusig na nakabatay sa oryentasyong sekswal (Patnubay ng United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees).

Mga Karapatan na Lumahok sa Pangkultural at Pampamilyang Buhay: Tinutugunan ng mga Prinsipyo bilang 24 hanggag 26 ang mga karapatan ng tao na lumahok sa pampamilyang buhay, sa mga pampublikong usapin, at sa kultural na buhay ng kanilang komunidad, nang walang diskriminasyon batay sa oryentasyong sekswal o kasariang pagkakakilanlan.
Halimbawa:
- Pananagutan ng mga Estado na huwag manino sa pagitan ng mga relasyon ng magkaibang-kasarian at ng mag-kapwa kasarian sa pagbibigay-benepisyo tulad ng mga pensyon sa mga naiwan ng isang namatay (desisyon ng UN Human Rights Committee).

Mga Karapatan ng mga Tagapagtanggol ng mga Karapatan ng Tao: Kinikilala ng Prinsipyo bilang 27 ang karapatan na ipagtanggol at isulong ang mga karapatan ng tao nang walang diskriminasyon batay sa oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pagkakakilanlan, at ang pananagutan ng mga Estado na tiyakin ang pagsasanggalang sa mga tagapagtanggol ng mga karapatan ng tao na gumagawa sa mga isyu ng oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pagkakakilanlan.
Mga halimbawa:
- Ang mga tagapagtanggol ng mga karapatan ng tao na gumagawa sa mga isyu ng oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pagkakakilanlan sa ilang mga bansa at rehiyon sa mundo “ay tinatakot at pinagbabantaan, nilolooban ang kanilang mga bahay at opisina, inaatake, pinahihirapan, sekswal na pinagsasamantalahan, pinahihirapan sa pamamagitan ng regular na pagbabanta sa kanilang buhay, at pinapatay. Ang isang malaking nakababahala rito ay ang halos walang pagseseryoso ng mga kinauukulan sa mga nasabing kaso.” (ulat ng Special Representative ng UN Secretary-General ukol sa mga tagapagtanggol ng karapatan ng mga tao).

Mga Karapatan ukol sa Pagkakaroon ng Remedyo at Pananagutan: Pinaninindigan ng mga Prinsipyo bilang 28 at 29 ang kahalagahan ng pagpapanagot sa mga lumalapastangan sa mga karapatan ng tao at ang pagtitiyak ng karampatang lunas  sa mga taong nahaharap sa paglapastangan ng kanilang mga karapatan.
Halimbawa:
- Ipinahayag ng UN High Commissioner for Human Rights ang pagkabahala tungkol sa “pagkakaligtas sa parusa sa mga krimen laban sa mga LGBT” at “ang pananagutan ng Estado na ibigay ang mabisang proteksyon.” Pinansin ng High Commissioner ang “pagsasantabi sa mga indibidwal na LGBT na magkaroon ng mga nasabing proteksyon bilang isang malinaw na paglabag sa pandaigdigang batas ukol sa karapatan ng tao pati na rin sa mga karaniwang pamantayan ng sangkatauhan na tumutukoy sa ating lahat.”

Mga Karagdagang Rekomendasyon: Inilalatag ng mga Prinsipyo ang karagdagang 16 na mga mungkahi sa mga pambansang institusyon sa karapatan ng tao, mga propesyonal na mga lupon, mga funders, NGO, ang High Commissioner for Human Rights, mga ahensiya ng UN, mga lupon ng mga treaty o kasunduan, Special Procedures ng United Nations, at iba pa.
Halimbawa:
- Bilang pangwakas, kinikilala ng mga Prinsipyo ang tungkulin ng isang hanay ng mga gumagawa para sa Karapatan ng Tao na itaguyod at ipagtanggol ang karapatan ng tao at isama ang mga pamantayang ito sa kanilang mga trabaho. Ang isang pinagsamang pahayag na inihatid sa UN Human Rights Council ng 54 Estado mula sa apat sa limang rehiyon ng UN noong ika-1 ng Disyembre taong 2006, halimbawa, ay nanghimok sa Human Rights Council na “bigyang-kaukulang atensyon ang mga paglabag sa karapatan ng tao batay sa oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pagkakakilanlan” at pinupuri ang gawain ng civil society sa mga isyung ito, at nanawagan sa “lahat ng Special Procedure at mga lupon ng mga treaty o kasunduan na ipagpatuloy na maisama sa loob ng kanilang mga kaugnay na gawain ang pagsasaalang-alang sa mga paglabag sa karapatang pantao batay sa oryentasyong sekswal at kasariang pagkakakilanlan.” Tulad ng pagkilala ng pahayag na ito at sa paninindigan ng mga Prinsipyo ng Yogyakarta, ang mabisang pagtatanggol sa mga karapatan ng tao ay totoong tungkulin ng lahat.

Yogyakarta Principles

Yogyakarta Principles

YOGYAKARTA PRINCIPLES

Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

The Yogyakarta Principles – An Overview

http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/principles_en_overview.htm

The Yogyakarta Principles address a broad range of international human rights standards and their application to issues of sexual orientation and gender identity.

This Overview provides a short outline of the Principles, and some examples of their application. Please refer to the Principles themselves for a detailed awareness of the text.

Preamble: The Preamble acknowledges human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity, establishes the relevant legal framework, and provides definitions of key terms.

Rights to Universal Enjoyment of Human Rights, Non-Discrimination and Recognition before the Law: Principles 1 to 3 set out the principles of the universality of human rights and their application to all persons without discrimination, as well as the right of all people to recognition before the law.

Example:

- Laws criminalising homosexuality violate the international right to non-discrimination (decision of the UN Human Rights Committee).

Rights to Human and Personal Security: Principles 4 to 11 address fundamental rights to life, freedom from violence and torture, privacy, access to justice and freedom from arbitrary detention.

Examples:

- The death penalty continues to be applied for consensual adult sexual activity between persons of the same sex, despite UN resolutions emphasizing that the death penalty may not be imposed for “sexual relations between consenting adults.”

- Eleven men were arrested in a gay bar and held in custody for over a year. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention concluded that the men were detained in violation of international law, noting with concern that “one of the prisoners died as a result of his arbitrary detention”.

Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Principles 12 to 18 set out the importance of non-discrimination in the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights, including employment, accommodation, social security, education and health.

Examples:

- Lesbian and transgender women are at increased risk of discrimination, homelessness and violence (report of UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing).

- Girls who display same-sex affection face discrimination and expulsion from educational institutions (report of UN Special Rapporteur on the right to education).

- The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has expressed concern about laws which “prohibit gender reassignment surgery for transsexuals or require intersex persons to undergo such surgery against their will”.

Right to Expression, Opinion and Association: Principles 19 to 21 emphasize the importance of the freedom to express oneself, one’s identity and one’s sexuality, without State interference based on sexual orientation and gender identity, including the rights to participate peaceably in public assemblies and events and otherwise associate in community with others.

Examples:

- A peaceful gathering to promote equality on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity was banned by authorities, and participants were harassed and intimidated by police and extremist nationalists shouting slogans such as “Let’s get the fags” and “We’ll do to you what Hitler did with the Jews” (report of the UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance).

Freedom of Movement and Asylum: Principles 22 and 23 highlight the rights of persons to seek asylum from persecution based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Example:

- Refugee protection should be accorded to persons facing a well-founded fear of persecution based on sexual orientation (Guidelines of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees).

Rights of Participation in Cultural and Family Life: Principles 24 to Principles 26 address the rights of persons to participate in family life, public affairs, and the cultural life of their community, without discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Example:

- States have an obligation not to discriminate between different-sex and same-sex relationships in allocating partnership benefits such as survivors’ pensions (decision of the UN Human Rights Committee).

Rights of Human Rights Defenders: Principle 27 recognizes the right to defend and promote human rights without discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and the obligation of States to ensure the protection of human rights defenders working in these areas.

Examples:

- Human rights defenders working on sexual orientation and gender identity issues in countries and regions around the world “have been threatened, had their houses and offices raided, they have been attacked, tortured, sexually abused, tormented by regular death threats and even killed. A major concern in this regard is an almost complete lack of seriousness with which such cases are treated by the concerned authorities.” (report of the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General on Human Rights Defenders).

Rights to Redress and Accountability: Principles 28 and 29 affirm the importance of holding rights violators accountable, and ensuring appropriate redress for those who face rights violations.

Example:

- The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has expressed concern about “impunity for crimes of violence against LGBT persons” and “the responsibility of the State to extend effective protection.” The High Commissioner notes that “excluding LGBT individuals from these protections clearly violates international human rights law as well as the common standards of humanity that define us all.”

Additional Recommendations: The Principles set out 16 additional recommendations to national human rights institutions, professional bodies, funders, NGOs, the High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN agencies, treaty bodies, Special Procedures, and others.

Example:

- The Principles conclude by recognizing the responsibility of a range of actors to promote and protect human rights and to integrate these standards into their work. A joint statement delivered at the UN Human Rights Council by 54 States from four of the five UN regions on 1 December 2006, for example, urges the Human Rights Council to “pay due attention to human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity” and commends the work of civil society in this area, and calls upon “all Special Procedures and treaty bodies to continue to integrate consideration of human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity within their relevant mandates.” As this statement recognizes, and the Yogyakarta Principles affirm, effective human rights protection truly is the responsibility of all.

Preamble: The Preamble acknowledges human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity, establishes the relevant legal framework, and provides definitions of key terms.
Rights to Universal Enjoyment of Human Rights, Non-Discrimination and Recognition before the Law:
Principles 1 to 3 set out the principles of the universality of human rights and their application to all persons without discrimination, as well as the right of all people to recognition before the law.
Example:
- Laws criminalising homosexuality violate the international right to non-discrimination (decision of the UN Human Rights Committee).
Rights to Human and Personal Security: Principles 4 to 11 address fundamental rights to life, freedom from violence and torture, privacy, access to justice and freedom from arbitrary detention.
Examples:
- The death penalty continues to be applied for consensual adult sexual activity between persons of the same sex, despite UN resolutions emphasizing that the death penalty may not be imposed for “sexual relations between consenting adults.”
- Eleven men were arrested in a gay bar and held in custody for over a year. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention concluded that the men were detained in violation of international law, noting with concern that “one of the prisoners died as a result of his arbitrary detention”.
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Principles 12 to 18 set out the importance of non-discrimination in the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights, including employment, accommodation, social security, education and health.
Examples:
- Lesbian and transgender women are at increased risk of discrimination, homelessness and violence (report of UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing).
- Girls who display same-sex affection face discrimination and expulsion from educational institutions (report of UN Special Rapporteur on the right to education).
- The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has expressed concern about laws which “prohibit gender reassignment surgery for transsexuals or require intersex persons to undergo such surgery against their will”.
Right to Expression, Opinion and Association: Principles 19 to 21 emphasize the importance of the freedom to express oneself, one’s identity and one’s sexuality, without State interference based on sexual orientation and gender identity, including the rights to participate peaceably in public assemblies and events and otherwise associate in community with others.
Examples:
- A peaceful gathering to promote equality on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity was banned by authorities, and participants were harassed and intimidated by police and extremist nationalists shouting slogans such as “Let’s get the fags” and “We’ll do to you what Hitler did with the Jews” (report of the UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance).
Freedom of Movement and Asylum: Principles 22 and 23 highlight the rights of persons to seek asylum from persecution based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Example:
- Refugee protection should be accorded to persons facing a well-founded fear of persecution based on sexual orientation (Guidelines of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees).
Rights of Participation in Cultural and Family Life: Principles 24 to Principles 26 address the rights of persons to participate in family life, public affairs, and the cultural life of their community, without discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Example:
- States have an obligation not to discriminate between different-sex and same-sex relationships in allocating partnership benefits such as survivors’ pensions (decision of the UN Human Rights Committee).
Rights of Human Rights Defenders: Principle 27 recognizes the right to defend and promote human rights without discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and the obligation of States to ensure the protection of human rights defenders working in these areas.
Examples:
- Human rights defenders working on sexual orientation and gender identity issues in countries and regions around the world “have been threatened, had their houses and offices raided, they have been attacked, tortured, sexually abused, tormented by regular death threats and even killed. A major concern in this regard is an almost complete lack of seriousness with which such cases are treated by the concerned authorities.” (report of the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General on Human Rights Defenders).
Rights to Redress and Accountability: Principles 29 and 29 affirm the importance of holding rights violators accountable, and ensuring appropriate redress for those who face rights violations.
Example:
- The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has expressed concern about “impunity for crimes of violence against LGBT persons” and “the responsibility of the State to extend effective protection.” The High Commissioner notes that “excluding LGBT individuals from these protections clearly violates international human rights law as well as the common standards of humanity that define us all.”
Additional Recommendations: The Principles set out 16 additional recommendations to national human rights institutions, professional bodies, funders, NGOs, the High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN agencies, treaty bodies, Special Procedures, and others.
Example:
- The Principles conclude by recognizing the responsibility of a range of actors to promote and protect human rights and to integrate these standards into their work. A joint statement delivered at the UN Human Rights Council by 54 States from four of the five UN regions on 1 December 2006, for example, urges the Human Rights Council to “pay due attention to human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity” and commends the work of civil society in this area, and calls upon “all Special Procedures and treaty bodies to continue to integrate consideration of human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity within their relevant mandates.” As this statement recognizes, and the Yogyakarta Principles affirm, effective human rights protection truly is the responsibility of all.

‘Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions’ focus on sexual orientation and gender identity

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

APF members focus on sexual orientiation, gender identity

http://www.asiapacificforum.net/news/apf-members-focus-on-sexual-orientiation-gender-identity.html

Discrimination and violence against people of diverse sexual orientation and gender identity remains a serious problem in countries across the Asia Pacific, a recent meeting of the region’s national human rights institutions has heard.

Discrimination and violence against people of diverse sexual orientation and gender identity remains a serious problem in countries across the Asia Pacific, a recent meeting of the region’s national human rights institutions (NHRIs) has heard.

The workshop was hosted by the Indonesian National Human Rights Commission and co-organised with the Asia Pacific Forum.

Held in Yogyakarta, Indonesia from 5 – 7 May, it was first regional workshop of its kind, bringing together participants from the national institutions of Indonesia, Australia, Malaysia, Jordan, Nepal, New Zealand, Palestine, Korea and Thailand.

The goal was to increase understanding and implementation of the Yogyakarta Principles among APF member institutions and to discuss the practical ways they could use their functions and powers to better protect and promote the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.

The workshop also featured keynote addresses from Professor Vitit Muntarbhorn (co-chair of the Yogyakarta Experts Group), Professor Michael O’Flaherty (Rapporteur of the Yogyakarta Experts Group) and other leading international figures.

Violations

Participants heard that people of diverse sexual orientation and gender identity, whether actual or perceived, can face execution or extra-judicial killing, torture, rape, arbitrary detention, unfair trials and, in the case of women, forced pregnancy and forced marriage.

These human rights violations occur at the hands of State officials and authorities and at the hands of non-State actors, often with the actual or implied complicity of State actors and often with impunity.

“While some NHRIs in the region have already done a significant amount of work in this field, for other institutions this was the first occasion they have discussed these issues,” said Pip Dargan, Deputy Director of the APF Secretariat.

“Even though national human rights institutions are at different stages in addressing these issues, there was unanimous agreement about the importance of making use of their common functions, including investigating complaints, reviewing laws and policies, holding national inquiries and public education.”

Outcomes

The workshop strongly deplored “all forms of stereotyping, exclusion, stigmatisation, prejudice, intolerance, discrimination and violence” against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.

It recognised that human rights defenders working with, and on behalf of, gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people can also face intimidation and violence and require greater protection and promotion of their rights.

The workshop conclusions also identified that “in all countries religious, cultural and moral values and sensitivities may arise in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity.”

However, participants affirmed that the expression of religious and other beliefs should not violate the rights and freedoms of others.

To build on the progress made at the meeting, participating NHRIs requested that the APF and its Secretariat:

* ask the Advisory Council of Jurists to review national laws in the countries of APF members, determine if they are consistent with international human rights standards relating to sexual orientation and gender identity and advise what amendments may be required (to be presented at the APF Annual Meeting in 2010)

* facilitate the exchange of information among member institutions on their human rights work in relation to sexual orientation and gender diversity

* assist member institutions to build their knowledge and awareness of human rights in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity, through training programs and staff exchanges

* include the Yogyakarta workshop as an agenda item at the APF Annual Meeting in 2010 and invite each APF member institution to provide a report on its activities in relation to human rights and sexual orientation and gender identity at that meeting.

UN-OHCHR: Justice and equality for all regardless of gender or sexual orientation

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

Justice and equality for all regardless of gender or sexual orientation

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/JusticeEqualityforallGenderorSexualorientation.aspx

In a strongly worded statement High Commissioner Navi Pillay has come out against discrimination directed at lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender groups.

Rama Yade, France’s Secretary of State for Human Rights under the Minister of Foreign and European Affairs, addresses delegates at the World Congress on human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in ParisPillay was speaking in a pre-recorded message to delegates at an international Congress in Paris organised by the French Government. The Congress aims to build on the progress made late last year when the UN General Assembly heard a statement endorsed by more than 50 countries which called for an end to rights abuses based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While the statement was non binding, it was squarely based on and reaffirmed existing protections for human rights in international law. It was historic, in that it was the first time that the condemnation of human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity was publically criticized by a large number of states, in the context of the General Assembly.

“The principles of universality and non-discrimination admit no exception,” Pillay said. “The criminalization of different sexual orientation cannot be justified either as a matter of law or as a matter of morality.”

In her address, Pillay acknowledged the concerns that are often expressed in discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Frequently, fears are expressed for the sanctity of the family. “Those doubts and fears,” she said, “can be readily addressed through a human rights approach, which upholds the principles of non-discrimination and respect for diversity.”

Concerns too are often voiced that respect for the human rights of gays, lesbians, bisexual and transgender people might unwittingly shield pedophiles from justice. “Nothing limits the applicability of criminal law where actual harm occurs,” she said, “as in the sexual abuse of children, irrespective of whether it is perpetrated by homosexuals or heterosexuals.”

The World Congress on human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity is being held at the National Assembly in Paris. The Congress has been organised with the participation also of the Norwegian and Dutch governments and in the framework of the celebration of the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia on 17 May.

15 May 2009

APF on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

http://www.asiapacificforum.net/issues/sexual_orientation

Image of rainbow flag

Discrimination and violence against people of diverse sexual orientation and gender identity is a serious problem in many countries across the Asia Pacific.

People of diverse sexual orientation and gender identity, whether actual or perceived, have faced execution or extra-judicial killing, torture, rape, arbitrary detention, unfair trials and, in the case of women, forced pregnancy and forced marriage.

These human rights violations occur at the hands of State officials and authorities and at the hands of non-State actors, often with the actual or implied complicity of State actors and often with impunity.

In 2006, in response to well-documented patterns of abuse, a distinguished group of international human rights experts outlined a set of international standards relating to sexual orientation and gender identity.

The result was the Yogyakarta Principles: a universal guide to human rights which affirm binding international legal standards with which all States must comply.

In May 2009, the APF brought together member institutions to discuss the role of NHRIs in promoting implementation of the Yogyakarta Principles.

They also discussed the practical ways that NHRIs could use their functions and powers – including investigating complaints, reviewing laws and policies, holding national inquiries and public education – to better protect and promote the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.

APF members concluded the meeting by strongly deploring “all forms of stereotyping, exclusion, stigmatisation, prejudice, intolerance, discrimination and violence” against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.

While recognising that “in all countries religious, cultural and moral values and sensitivities may arise in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity”, they affirmed that the expression of religious and other beliefs should not violate the rights and freedoms of others.

Continuing its focus on this issue, the APF and its Secretariat will:

  • ask the Advisory Council of Jurists to review national laws in the countries of APF members, determine if they are consistent with international human rights standards relating to sexual orientation and gender identity and advise what amendments may be required (to be presented at the APF Annual Meeting in 2010)
  • facilitate the exchange of information among member institutions on their human rights work in relation to sexual orientation and gender diversity
  • assist member institutions to build their knowledge and awareness of human rights in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity, through training programs and staff exchanges, and
  • include the Yogyakarta workshop as an agenda item at the APF Annual Meeting in 2010 and invite each APF member institution to provide a report on its activities in relation to human rights and sexual orientation and gender identity at that meeting.

* APF = Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions

International Appeal Against Transphobia / Pandaigdigang Panawagan Laban sa Transphobia

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

transphobia-appeal1

Reject Transphobia, Respect Gender Identity:

An Appeal to the United Nations,

the World Health Organisation and the States of the World

Every day, people who live at variance to expected gender[1] norms face violence, abuse, rape, torture and hate crime all over the world, in their home as well as in the public arena. Though most cases of violence never get documented, we know that in the first weeks of 2009 alone, Trans women have been murdered in Honduras, Serbia and in the USA. Trans men are equally victims of hate crimes, prejudice and discrimination despite their frequent social and cultural invisibility.

The basic human rights of Trans people are being ignored or denied in all nations – be it out of ignorance, prejudice, fear or hate and Trans people overwhelmingly face daily discrimination, which results in social exclusion, poverty, poor health care and little prospects of appropriate employment.

Far from protecting Trans citizens, States and International bodies reinforce social transphobia through short sighted negligence or reactionary politics:

Because of the failure of national law and social justice, in far too many States Trans people are being forced to live a gender which they experience as fundamentally wrong for them. In most countries, any attempt to change one’s gender can lead to legal sanctions, brutal mistreatment and social stigma. In other countries, legal recognition of gender change is subject to sterilization or other major surgical intervention. Trans people who cannot or do not wish to submit to this, cannot obtain legal recognition of their preferred gender, and are forced to ‘come out’ whenever they cross a border, run into a police patrol, apply for a new job, move into a new home or simply want to buy a mobile phone.

Contributing factors include that current International health classifications still consider all Trans people as mentally “disordered”. This outdated vision is insulting and incorrect and is used to justify daily discrimination and stigmatization in all aspects of Trans people’s lives.

Recently though in some countries with very different social and cultural contexts significant legal advances have been made. Following in the wake of bold judicial decisions, State action has led to increased acceptance of Trans people within their society. This demonstrates that understanding and progress is possible.

Currently Trans people everywhere in the world rise up to reclaim their human rights and freedom. They carry an unanimous message that they will no longer accept to be labelled sick or treated as non human beings on the basis of their gender identity and gender expression.

This is why we ask:

- The W.H.O. to stop considering Trans people as mentally disordered and to promote access to adequate health care and psychological support, as desired by Trans people.

- The United Nations Human Rights bodies to examine the human rights abuses that Trans people face around the world and to take action to combat these abuses.

- The States of the World to adopt the international Yogyakarta Principles and ensure that all Trans people benefit from appropriate health care, including gender reassignment if they so wish; be allowed to adapt their civil status to their preferred gender; live their social, family or professional lives without being exposed to transphobic discrimination, prejudice or hate crime and that they are protected by the police and justice systems from physical and non-physical violence.

We call on the UN, the W.H.O. and the nations of the world, in adopting these measures, to refuse transphobia and welcome the right of their citizens to live fully and freely in their preferred gender, assumed as an expression of cultural freedom.


[1] (such as transvestite, transsexual, transgender and other cultural identities related to cross-gender dressing and living)


Tanggihan ang Transphobia, Igalang ang Pagkakakilanlang Pangkasarian:

Isang Panawagan sa United Nations,

sa World Health Organisation at sa mga Estado ng Mundo

Araw-araw, ang mga taong namumuhay na iba sa mga inaasahang pangkasariang[1] pamantayan ay nahaharap sa karahasan, pangaaabuso, pagkakagahasa, torture at mga krimen ng pagkamuhi saan man sa mundo, sa kanilang mga tahanan maging sa mga pambulikong lugar. Kahit na karamihan sa mga kaso ng karahasan ay hindi nasusulat, alam natin na noong mga unang linggo ng taong 2009 maraming kababaihang trans ang napatay sa Honduras, Serbia at Estados Unidos. Ang mga lalakeng trans naman ay kapwa biktima rin ng mga krimen ng pagkamuhi, paninino, at diskriminasyon kahit pa hindi sila madalas makita sa lipunan at sa kultura.

Ang mga pangunahing karapatang pantao ng mga Trans ay kasalukuyang hindi pinagtutuunang-pansin o kaya’y sadyang ipinagkakait sa lahat ng mga bansa sa mundo – bunga ito ng kamangmangan, paninino, takot o pagkamuhi na nagreresulta sa panlipunang pagsasantabi, kahirapan, mababang serbisyong pangkalusugan at maliit na pagkakataon para sa mga taong Trans na magkaroon ng angkop na trabaho.

Malayo sa pagkalinga sa mga mamamayang Trans, pinagtitibay pa ng mga Estado at mga pandaigigang katawan ang panlipunang transphobia o ang di-maipaliwanag na takot at pagkamuhi sa mga taong transgender sa pamamagitan ng mga pagpapabaya at mga makikitid o reaksyonaryong pulitika:

Dahil sa kakulangan ng batas at ng panlipunan hustisya, ang mga trans sa maraming Estado sa mundo ang napipilitang mamuhay sa isang kasariang sadyang mali para sa kanila. Sa maraming bansa ang mga tangka upang baguhin ang sariling kasarian ay napupunta sa paghingi ng legal na pahintulot, malupit na pagtrato at panlipunang stigma o batik sa karangalan. Sa ibang bansa, ang anumang legal na pagkilala sa pagbabago ng kasarian ay mangangahulugan ng sterilization (pagkabaog) o kaya’y ibang klase ng operasyon sa katawan. Ang mga taong trans na hindi o ayaw pumayag na sumailalim rito ay hindi makakakuha ng legal na pagkilala sa kanilang napiling kasarian at mapipilitang magladlad sa tuwing sila ay tatawid ng isang border, sa tuwing mapapalapit sila sa isang patrol ng pulis, sa tuwing maghahanap ng panibagong trabaho, sa tuwing lilipat sa panibagong bahay o sa simpleng pagbili ng cellphone.

Ang mga salik na nakadaragdag sa ganitong sitwasyon ng mga Trans ay ang patuloy na pagtukoy ng mga pandaigdigang klasipikasyon sa kalusugan na ang mga taong Trans ay may “sakit” sa pag-iisip. Mapanglait at mali ang makalumang pagtinging ito na kadalasang ginagamit na basehan para sa pang-araw-araw na paninino at paglalagay-batik-karangalan sa lahat ng aspeto ng buhay ng mga taong Trans.

Ngunit sa ngayon sa may ilang mga bansang may kakaibang pangkultural at panlipunang konteksto, mayroon na ring nagawang mahahalagang legal na mga pag-abanse. Kasunod ng mga mapangahas na mga hatol sa hukuman, ang pagkilos ng Estado ay nagbunga ng patuloy na pagtanggap sa lipunan para sa mga taong Trans. Ipinapakita rito na ang pag-unawa sa at pag-unlad ng isyu ukol sa mga Trans ay posible.

Sa kasalukuyan maraming Trans sa buong mundo ang tumitindig upang muling angkinin ang kanilang mga kalayaan at mga karapatang pantao. Dala nila ang nagkakaisang mensahe na hindi na nila muling tatanggapin ang pagtawag sa kanila bilang mga may sakit (sa pag-iisip) o ang di-makataong pagtrato dahil sa kanilang pagkakakilanlang pangkasarian (gender identity) at sa kanilang pagpapahayag na pangkasarian (gender expression).

At kung kaya’t hinihiling namin na:

- Tigilan ng W.H.O. ang pagtukoy sa mga taong Trans bilang may mga sakit sa pag-iisip at itaguyod ang sapat na pangagalagang pangkalusugan at suportang sikolohikal na nais ng mga taong Trans.

- Siyasatin ng mga sangay pangkarapatang pantao ng United Nations ang mga pang-aabusong kinakaharap ng mga taong Trans sa buong mundo at kumilos para sugpuin ang mga pangaabusong ito.

- Gamitin ng mga Estado at mga Bansa sa Mundo ang pang-internasyunal na mga Prinsipyo ng Yogyakarta (Yogyakarta Principles) at tiyakin na lahat ng taong Trans ay magkamit ng kaukulang pangangalagang pangkalusugan, pati na ang gender reassignment o operasyon para sa pagpapalit-kasarian, kung kanilang nais; pahintulutang iayon ang estadong sibil / civil status sa napiling kasarian ng mga taong Trans; magkaroon ng panlipunan, pampamilya at propesyonal na mga buhay na hindi nahaharap sa paninino, diskriminasyon at krimeng kaugnay ng transphobia, at mabigyang proteksyon ng kapulisan at ng hustisya laban sa pisikal at di-pisikal na karahasan.

Nananawagan kami sa UN, sa W.H.O. at sa mga bansa sa mundo na gawin ang mga hakbang na nabanggit dito, na tanggihan ang transphobia, at tanggapin ang isang aspeto ng kalayaang pangkultural, ang karapatang mabuhay ng buo at malaya sa napiling kasarian.


[1] Tulad ng mga transpinay, bayot, bantut, at ilang bakla at tomboy sa Pilipinas, transvestite, transsexual, transgender at iba pang kultural na pagkakakilanlan (cultural identity) kaugnay ng pagdadamit at pamumuhay na may kinalaman sa pagbabago/pagpapalit ng kasarian (cross-gender dressing and living). Trans o transgender ang pandaidigan at pangkalahatang pantukoy sa mga taong namumuhay na iba ang pagkakakilanlang pangkasarian (gender identity). Mula sa Society of Transsexual Women of the Philippines (STRAP), transpinay ang tawag sa mga babaeng galing sa Pilipinas at ipinanganak na mayroong aring panglalake.

UN Gen. Assembly Statement Affirms Rights for all

Sunday, December 21st, 2008

 

United Nations

UN Gen. Assembly Statement Affirms Rights for all
First ever statement on sexual orientation and gender identity at the UN General Assembly
19/12/2008

The statement read by Argentina and the counterstatement read by the Syrian Arab Republic that immediately followed can be seen respectively at 2:25:00 and at 2:32:00 in the video archived on the UN website and marked as “18 December 08 General Assembly: 70th and 71st plenary meeting – Morning session”.

We have the honour to make this statement on human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity on behalf of Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Estonia, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guinea-Bissau, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Montenegro, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Paraguay, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

1 – We reaffirm the principle of universality of human rights, as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights whose 60th anniversary is celebrated this year, Article 1 of which proclaims that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”;

2 – We reaffirm that everyone is entitled to the enjoyment of human rights without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, as set out in Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 2 of the International Covenants on Civil and Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, as well as in article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;

3 – We reaffirm the principle of non-discrimination which requires that human rights apply equally to every human being regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity;

4 – We are deeply concerned by violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms based on sexual orientation or gender identity;

5 – We are also disturbed that violence, harassment, discrimination, exclusion, stigmatisation and prejudice are directed against persons in all countries in the world because of sexual orientation or gender identity, and that these practices undermine the integrity and dignity of those subjected to these abuses;

6 – We condemn the human rights violations based on sexual orientation or gender identity wherever they occur, in particular the use of the death penalty on this ground, extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the practice of torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, arbitrary arrest or detention and deprivation of economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to health;

7 – We recall the statement in 2006 before the Human Rights Council by fifty four countries requesting the President of the Council to provide an opportunity, at an appropriate future session of the Council, for discussing these violations;

8 – We commend the attention paid to these issues by special procedures of the Human Rights Council and treaty bodies and encourage them to continue to integrate consideration of human rights violations based on sexual orientation or gender identity within their relevant mandates;

9 – We welcome the adoption of Resolution AG/RES. 2435 (XXXVIII-O/08) on “Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity” by the General Assembly of the Organization of American States during its 38th session in 3 June 2008;

10 – We call upon all States and relevant international human rights mechanisms to commit to promote and protect human rights of all persons, regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity;

11 – We urge States to take all the necessary measures, in particular legislative or administrative, to ensure that sexual orientation or gender identity may under no circumstances be the basis for criminal penalties, in particular executions, arrests or detention.

12 – We urge States to ensure that human rights violations based on sexual orientation or gender identity are investigated and perpetrators held accountable and brought to justice;

13 – We urge States to ensure adequate protection of human rights defenders, and remove obstacles which prevent them from carrying out their work on issues of human rights and sexual orientation and gender identity.

World