Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

AAI Sexual Diversity Scorecard: International Trans Survey

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

PLEASE DISSEMINATE TO TRANS and LGBTIQ ORGANISATIONS INTERNATIONALLY

Dear Colleagues,

AIDS Accountability International (AAI) is an independent research organization that focuses on holding leaders accountable for the promises they make on HIV and AIDS. We are currently conducting the Sexual Diversity Scorecard research on how governments are performing on issues for sexually diverse or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer people (LGBTIQ).

Due to the lack of available data on trans people AAI has decided to conduct the first international survey on trans individuals with regard to government accountability and HIV and AIDS.

It is in this context that I would like to invite you and your organization to participate in our survey on trans individuals.

Along with this letter is a questionnaire that asks a variety of questions about trans issues. I am asking you or a coalition of your colleagues to look over the questionnaire and, if you choose to do so, complete it and send it back to me at: phillipa@aidsaccountability.org BEFORE 30 SEPTEMBER 2010.

If you require the questionnaire to be translated into another language please email me and we will do so.

The survey results will be used to create a comparative global picture which will be provided to national advocacy groups to create positive change in their countries.

Regardless of whether you choose to participate, please let me know if you would like a summary of our findings. To receive a summary, email Phillipa Tucker at:phillipa@aidsaccountability.org

Please note that we are also conducting a survey on Violence against LGBTIQs. If you have not received information regarding this project please email me or check our website at www.aidsaccountability.org

Many thanks for sharing your knowledge and participating in this important research project.

Sincerely,

Phillipa Tucker

Phillipa Tucker
Senior Researcher
AIDS Accountability International
Plein Park Building
68-83 Plein St, Cape Town
South Africa, 8001

Tel: +27 (0) 21 466 80 74
Mobile: +27 (0) 82 225 15 98
Email: phillipa@aidsaccountability.org
Website: www.aidsaccountability.org

Reasons Why We Need the RH Law

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

Reasons Why We Need the RH Law
by EnGendeRights, Inc.

1. To respond to the clamor of the Philippine population who want the Reproductive Health Care Bill passed into law
2. To prevent unintended pregnancies
3. To prevent maternal deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth
4. To prevent infant mortality
5. To help individuals and couples choose freely and responsibly when to have children
6. To reduce abortion rates
7. To give rape victims a better chance to heal from their ordeal
8. To prevent early pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases especially among adolescents
9. To address the rising HIV/AIDS cases
10. To avoid the negative impact of large families on poor families
11. To free women’s bodies from being held hostage by politics and fundamentalism

For a full copy the Report, follow this link.

The Alan Guttmacher Institute has released recent statistics on abortion incidence in the Philippines showing 560,000 Filipino women induced abortion in 2008 with about 1000 women dying and 90,000 women being hospitalized due to complications from unsafe abortion.  (Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), Meeting Women’s Contraceptive Needs in the Philippines, 1 In Brief 2 (2009), http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/2009/04/15/IB_MWCNP.pdf)

According to the AIDS Registry data (passive surveillance), there has been sudden increases in HIV positive cases yearly since 2007 – 54% between 2007 and 2008 and 58% from 2008 to 2009.[1] At the start of 2010, there are already four new cases being reported every day compared to the two new cases reported daily in 2009.[2]  According to the projections of Dr. Enrique Tayag, Director of the National Epidemiology Center (NEC), by December 2010, there will be an additional 1,500 Filipinos newly-infected by HIV; by 2011, the newly infected will number 4,000 – 7,000. [3]

[1] Philippine National AIDS Council, Country Report of the Philippines, January 2008 to December 2009
[2] Tayag, Tracking HIV, Proceedings 1st HIV Summit: Call for Action and Broad-Based Responses to AIDS by Leaders, 2010
[3] Tayag, Tracking HIV, Proceedings 1st HIV Summit: Call for Action and Broad-Based Responses to AIDS by Leaders, 2010.   Also according to Tayag – “All regions have reported at least one case in the last 25 years. Only eight of our provinces have yet to report their first case.”

Practical action on sexual orientation, gender identity

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

Five APF member institutions – Australia, Indonesia, Mongolia, New Zealand and the Philippines – have received donor funding for projects that will raise awareness and bolster protection for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people.

The projects were developed following the first-ever regional workshop of national human rights institutions (NHRI) which highlighted the discrimination, violence and other human rights abuses that LGBT people regularly face in the Asia Pacific.

Held in May 2009 and organised by the APF, participants discussed the practical steps that their national human rights institutions could take to help implement the Yogyakarta Principles, a set of legally binding international human rights standards relating to sexual orientation and gender identity.

There was unanimous agreement about the importance of using their common functions – such as investigating complaints, reviewing laws and policies and undertaking public education – to bring about long-term change.

At the conclusion of the workshop, the APF was requested to assist member institutions build their knowledge and capacity to address human rights violations that LGBT communities encounter.

Earlier this year, the APF coordinated a joint funding application to secure financial support to assist five member institutions implement a range of targeted activities, which will all take place prior to April 2011.

The Philippines Commission on Human Rights will establish partnerships with LGBT groups, examine and assess existing national laws and policies, advocate on the rights of LGBT people and develop a human rights education module for local government or community groups which, following a formal evaluation, can be delivered in a broader range of settings.

Originally posted: 20 July 2010, The Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions
Full copy of text: http://www.asiapacificforum.net/news/practical-action-on-sexual-orientation-gender-identity.html

EU Toolkit to Promote and Protect the Enjoyment of all Human Rights by LGBT People

Saturday, July 3rd, 2010

Council of the European Union: Toolkit to Promote and Protect the Enjoyment of all Human Rights by Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) People

Monday 28 June 2010 by Council of the European Union

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Brussels, 17 June 2010
11179/10
LIMITE
COHOM 162
PESC 804
From: Working Party on Human Rights
To: Political and Security Committee
Subject: Toolkit to Promote and Protect the Enjoyment of all Human Rights by Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) People

1. On 8 June 2010 the Working Party on Human Rights adopted the Toolkit to Promote and Protect the Enjoyment of all Human Rights by Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) People, as set out in the Annex.

2. The PSC is invited to take note of the LGBT Toolkit. This document will help the EU institutions, EU Member State capitals, EU Delegations, Representations and Embassies to react proactively to violations of the human rights of LGBT people, and to address structural causes behind these violations.

The document aims to provide staff in the EU Headquarters, EU Member States’ capitals, EU Delegations, Representations and Embassies with an operational set of tools to be used in contacts with third countries, as well as with international and civil society organisations, in order to promote and protect the human rights enjoyed by LGBT people within its external action. It seeks to enable the EU to proactively react to cases of human rights violations of LGBT people and to structural causes behind these violations. By doing so, the Toolkit will further contribute to reinforcing and supporting the EU’s human rights policy in general.

Gender identity and sexual orientation continue to be used as justifications for serious human rights violations around the world. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) people constitute a vulnerable group and continue to fall victims of persecution, discrimination and gross ill-treatment, often involving extreme forms of violence. In several countries, sexual relations between consenting adults of the same sex are considered a crime and punished with imprisonment or with the death penalty.

The EU strongly supports the entitlement by all individuals, without discrimination, to enjoy the full range of human rights. The promotion and protection of human rights features as a key objective of the EU’s external action. Through the different tools available to it within its external action, including the financial instruments available both through the EU institutions and the Member States, the EU will seek to actively promote and protect the enjoyment of all human rights by LGBT people.

This document takes full account of the EU Guidelines on Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law. The Guidelines on the death penalty, on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, on human rights defenders and on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them are particularly relevant.

Download full document: st11179.en10.pdf

Saudi Arabia bans employment of Filipino lesbians and gays

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Report from Fridae.com
10 Jun 2010
Saudi Arabia bans employment of gay, lesbian Filipino workers
by News Editor

The Saudi Arabian government has reportedly directed recruitment agencies in Manila, Philippines not to recruit gay and lesbian workers for jobs in the Middle Eastern country.

The Philipines-based GMA News on Jun 2 reported that the consular section of the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia has sent a memorandum dated May 26 instructing recruitment agencies in Manila to be stricter in screening job applicants bound for the country said to be the top destination for migrant Filipino workers.

“Officials of recruitment agencies who are responsible in conducting interviews of job applicants to Saudi Arabia are strongly advised to screen them thoroughly so that those belonging to the third sex are excluded,” the memo read.

It also warned that non-compliant agencies will have their accreditation permanently terminated.

It is not known what prompted the memo.

Last June, 67 Filipino men were arrested after they were found cross-dressing and drinking at a private party near the capital city of Riyadh. The men were subsequently sentenced to imprisonment and flogging but were pardoned and released in July the same year. None were charged with homosexual acts, a much more serious charge under Saudi law.

GMA News quoted Vice Consul Roussel Reyes of the Philippine Embassy in Riyadh as saying that nearly 50 other Filipinos have been arrested and jailed in the past for similar violations. The report added that men caught wearing even just one article of women’s clothing could face three to six months imprisonment, and suffer between 50 and 100 lashes with a rattan stick.

According to the International Lesbian and Gay Association, sodomy is illegal and punishable by death by stoning under Saudi-Arabia’s Sharia law. All sexual relations outside of marriage are illegal, including sexual relations between women.

Danton Remoto, Chairman Emeritus of Ang Ladlad, a LGBT advocacy group acknowledged that while the Saudi government has the right to implement its own policie, prohibiting the recruitment of gay and lesbian workers is tantamount to discrimination.

In an interview with “24 Oras” news programme, he added that it was not simply a matter of implementing the law but a human rights issue, as the policy would mean fewer job opportunities for Filipinos in the Saudi country. [An estimated 1 million Filipinos currently work in the Muslim nation of some 24 million, 6.36 million of whom are immigrants. An estimated 10 percent of the Philippines's population, or nearly 8 million people, work overseas.]

He further questioned how the Saudi government plans to implement the policy, particularly on determining whether a worker is gay or not. “How will the screening work? Will it based on hair length, or one’s raising of an eyebrow?” he asked wryly.

While the Middle East chapter of migrants’ rights group Migrante International urged Philippine authorities to clarify the new policy, the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA) has advised Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW) to be more careful with their demeanor while in the Kingdom to avoid being arrested.

“What happens is wherever we are, if we violate the laws of our host country, offenses will have corresponding sanctions,” said OWWA director for policy and program development Vivian Tornea.

Saudi Arabia bans employment of Filipino lesbians and gays

Report from GMA News
Saudi govt gets tough on gay, lesbian workers
JERRIE ABELLA, GMANews.TV
Article posted June 02, 2010 – 11:47 PM

For nine years, Ramil Autentico had to watch his moves as an overseas Filipino worker (OFW) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

That was because as a homosexual, Ramil knew very well that the Saudi government didn’t approve of his sexual preference.

“Once na nakita nilang kumembot ka, nag-makeup ka doon na lalaki ka, alam na nilang bakla ka. Ikukulong ka. Kapag nakita ka nila, alam na kasi nila ang word na bakla, sisigawan ka nilang ‘bakla’, ‘harami’. Ang ibig sabihin ng ‘harami’, delikado ka,” Autentico said in an interview aired over “24 Oras” Wednesday night.

(Once they see you swaying your hips or applying make-up and you’re a man, they’ll conclude that you’re gay and detain you. They call you ‘gay,’ or ‘harami’, which means you’re in danger of being arrested.)

The Saudi government follows Shari’ah or Islamic law, which strictly prohibits open display of homosexual behavior.

Last month, the Saudi government took its drive against homosexuality a step further when it banned the recruitment of gay and lesbian workers, including those from other countries.

In a May 26 memorandum, the consular section of the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia reminded recruitment agencies in Manila to be stricter in screening job applicants to the Middle Eastern country.

“Officials of recruitment agencies who are responsible in conducting interviews of job applicants to Saudi Arabia are strongly advised to screen them thoroughly so that those belonging to the third sex are excluded,” the memo read.

The accreditation of recruitment agencies found to have failed to observe this advisory would be permanently terminated, it added.

Discrimination

While Philippine groups respect the Saudi government’s decision in light of its sovereignty, they branded this recent move as discriminatory and urged the Philippine government to seek “clarification.”

The group Ang Ladlad, which advocates the rights of gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transsexuals, said while the Saudi government has the right to implement its own policies, prohibiting the recruitment of gay and lesbian workers is tantamount to discrimination.

“If the policy was signed by their King, Saudi authorities are duty-bound to implement it. It is up to them to decide what to do,” said Ang Ladlad leader Danton Remoto in Filipino in the “24 Oras” report.

Remoto said it was not simply a matter of implementing the law but a human rights issue, as the policy would mean fewer job opportunities for Filipinos in Saudi Arabia, the top destination for migrant Filipino workers.

Remoto questioned how the Saudi government plans to implement the policy, particularly on determining whether a worker is gay or not. “How will the screening work? Will it based on hair length, or one’s raising of an eyebrow?” he asked

Clarification sought

In a phone interview with GMANews.TV, the Middle East chapter of migrants’ rights group Migrante International urged Philippine authorities to clarify the new policy.

“We need to understand the cultural limitations in this country, but the Philippine government must seek a clarification on the basis of labor relations between the two countries,” said Migrante coordinator for the Middle East John Leonard Monterona.

The Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) refused to comment, saying it is currently discussing the new policy, according to the “24 Oras” report.

For its part, the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA) advised OFWs to be more careful with their demeanor while in the Kingdom to avoid being arrested.

“What happens is wherever we are, if we violate the laws of our host country, offenses will have corresponding sanctions,” said OWWA director for policy and program development Vivian Tornea in the newscast.

“As part of our pre-departure program, the workers leaving the country are educated and informed about the laws and the culture of the host country and we advise them to conform to the norms,” she added.

Last year, 72 Filipinos were arrested and lashed for cross-dressing in a private concert in eastern Riyadh.

Normal penalties include fines, imprisonment and whipping. Individuals found to be wearing even one article of women’s clothing can be imprisoned for three to six months and whipped with a rattan stick between 50 and 100 times. - KBK, GMANews.TV

Report of Special Rapporteur on Health to UN Human Rights Council 14th Session

Thursday, June 10th, 2010
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Anand Grover, to the Fourteenth session of the United Nations Human Rights Council under Agenda item 3: Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development

FULL REPORT: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/14session/A.HRC.14.20.pdf

Summary

In the present report, submitted in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 6/29, the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health examines the relationship between the right to the highest attainable standard of health and the criminalization of three forms of private, adult, consensual sexual behaviour: same-sex conduct and sexual orientation, sex work, and HIV transmission.

Section I contains a brief introduction. In section II, the Special Rapporteur considers the criminalization of consensual, same-sex conduct between adults, along with criminalization based upon sexual orientation or gender identity. In that section the Special Rapporteur highlights how recent international and national jurisprudence has recognized close connections between the concepts of privacy, equality and dignity, and examines its effects on the enjoyment of the right to health.

In section III, the denial of sex workers’ enjoyment of the right to health that results from the criminalization of sex work and related practices (such as solicitation) is considered. Impacts on the right to health, similar to those discussed in section II, are canvassed along with issues particular to sex work. Specifically, the failure of legal recognition of the sex-work sector results in infringements of the right to health, through the failure to provide safe working conditions, and a lack of recourse to legal remedies for occupational health issues. Additionally, the distinction between sex work and trafficking is considered, in particular with respect to legislation and interventions that, by failing to distinguish between these groups, are increasingly infringing sex workers’ right to health.

In section IV the Special Rapporteur examines the impact of the criminalization of HIV transmission with respect to the right to health. The far-reaching impact of criminal laws on the enjoyment of the right to health is considered, along with the failure of such laws to achieve legitimate public health aims or the objectives of the criminal law. The Special Rapporteur concludes that only intentional, malicious HIV transmission can be legitimately criminalized; however, specific criminal laws concerning HIV transmission are generally unnecessary.

Finally, the Special Rapporteur suggests that decriminalization is necessary in response to each of the aforementioned issues, alongside other measures necessary as part of a comprehensive right-to-health approach. Such measures include human rights education, the participation and inclusion of vulnerable groups, and efforts to reduce stigma and discrimination in respect of these groups.

UNAIDS and UNDP support report of Special Rapporteur on Right to Health

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

From: Mandeep Dhaliwal
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 2:11 PM
Subject: UNAIDS and UNDP statement at the Human Right Council on Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health’s report on criminalization

UNAIDS and UNDP issued a short statement (please see attached) in support of the report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health. The report is about the relationship between the right to health and criminalization of three forms of private adult consensual sexual behavior: same sex conduct and sexual orientation, sex work and HIV transmission.

To read the report of the Special Rapporteur, click here: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/14session/A.HRC.14.20.pdf

Dr Mandeep Dhaliwal
Cluster Leader: Human Rights, Gender & Sexual Diversities
United Nations Development Programme
HIV/AIDS Practice
Bureau for Development Policy
304 East 45th Street, FF-1180
New York, NY 10017
Tel: (212) 906 6590
Fax: (212) 906 5023
www.undp.org

WPATH urges de-psychopathologisation of gender variance

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 26, 2010

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health has prepared and released a statement urging the de-psychopathologisation of gender variance worldwide. The statement is as follows:

The WPATH Board of Directors strongly urges the de-psychopathologisation of gender variance worldwide. The expression of gender characteristics, including identities, that are not stereotypically associated with one’s assigned sex at birth is a common and culturally-diverse human phenomenon which should not be judged as inherently pathological or negative. The psychopathologlisation of gender characteristics and identities reinforces or can prompt stigma, making prejudice and discrimination more likely, rendering transgender and transsexual people more vulnerable to social and legal marginalisation and exclusion, and increasing risks to mental and physical well-being. WPATH urges governmental and medical professional organizations to review their policies and practices to eliminate stigma toward gender-variant people.”

Supreme Court Affirms the Equality in Political Participation of Filipino LGBTs

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Yesterday, April 8, 2010, the Philippine Supreme Court released its decision regarding the petition for certiorari filed by Ang Ladlad LGBT Party (with regards to the decision of the Commission on Elections refusing accreditation to the LGBT group and therefore denying the party its participation in the May 2010 National Elections on grounds of morality and on the belief that homosexuals are a threat to the youth); the Court grants the petition.

Part of the Supreme Court decision reads

“We thus find that it was grave violation of the non-establishment clause for the COMELEC to utilize the Bible and the Koran to justify the exclusion of Ang Ladlad.

… we hold that moral disapproval, without more, is not a sufficient governmental interest to justify exclusion of homosexuals from participation in the party-list system. The denial of Ang Ladlad’s registration on purely moral grounds amounts more to a statement of dislike and disapproval of homosexuals, rather than a tool to further any substantial public interest. Respondent’s blanket justifications give rise to the inevitable conclusion that the COMELEC targets homosexuals themselves as a class, not because of any particular morally reprehensible act. It is this selective targeting that implicates our equal protection clause.

Our Decision today is fully in accord with our international obligations to protect and promote human rights. In particular, we explicitly recognize the principle of non-discrimination as it relates to the right to electoral participation, enunciated in the UDHR and the ICCPR. Although sexual orientation is not specifically enumerated as a status or ratio for discrimination in Article 26 of the ICCPR, the ICCPR Human Rights Committee has opined that the reference to “sex” in Article 26 should be construed to include “sexual orientation.”

WHEREFORE, the Petition is hereby GRANTED. The Resolutions of the Commission on Elections dated November 11, 2009 and December 16, 2009 in SPP No. 09-228 (PL) are hereby SET ASIDE. The Commission on Elections is directed to GRANT petitioner’s application for party-list accreditation.”

For a full copy of the Supreme Court ruling, refer to the following link:
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/april2010/190582.htm

Joint statement at the UN Human Rights Council in interactive dialogue with the High Commissioner for Human Rights, March 2010

Monday, March 8th, 2010

UN Human Rights Council, 13th session
Item 2: Interactive Dialogue with High Commissioner

Joint statement by:
International Lesbian and Gay Association (European Region), Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, Akina Mama wa Afrika, Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD), Associação Brasileira de Gays, Lésbicas e Transgêneros (ABGLT), Association for Women’s Rights in Development (AWID), Center for Women’s Global Leadership, COC Nederland, Frontline, International Alliance of Women, International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), International Service for Human Rights (ISHR), LBL Denmark, Lesbian and Gay Federation in Germany (LSVD), Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights (RFSL), Unitarian Universalist Association, World Organisation against Torture (OMCT)*

Thank you Mr. President,

Madam High Commissioner, we recently had the privilege of communicating to you a letter in support of your inclusion of issues of sexual orientation and gender identity in your SMP, outlined in your Annual Report, and would like to take the opportunity of reaffirming that support in this more public setting.

I now have the honour to take the floor on behalf of 97 NGOs*, including 16 with ECOSOC accreditation. We represent human rights defenders from 50 countries in every region of the globe. While we share a commitment to equality and non-discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity, we come from diverse cultures and backgrounds, and work on a broad range of issues, including the human rights of women, migrants, HIV/AIDS issues, education, health, poverty, democratic governance, and more.

We join together across our diverse regions and experiences to thank you for your commitment to promoting and protecting the human rights of all people, regardless of their sexual orientation and gender identity.

We appreciate your recent public statements expressing deep concerns about the Anti-Homosexuality Bill in Uganda and the recent arrests in Malawi following a same-sex relationship celebration.

We also wish to express our appreciation and strong support for the explicit identification of human rights issues relating to sexual orientation in the thematic priorities of your Office, and would encourage you to also address gender identity/expression within these priorities.

These issues are of crucial and urgent human rights concern. As you will be aware, in too many countries, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people continue to face criminal sanctions, killings, violence or torture because of how we live or who we love. Lesbians are subject to so-called“curative”rape, intersex people are subject to medical abuses, transgender persons demeaned and beaten, their rights and identities unrecognised. We are denied health care or needed treatment; we routinely face discrimination in work, housing and education. In many countries, our work as human rights defenders is opposed, obstructed or banned. Our rights to peacefully gather are often denied, while attempts are made to silence our voices. Too often, the violence and abuse we endure in countries around the world goes unreported, uninvestigated and unpunished.

The opposition by some States to even recognising these as human rights violations itself highlights how important it is that violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity be explicitly addressed as thematic priorities by your Office. Inclusion of these grounds needs to be explicit, since otherwise the very States responsible for human rights violations would “interpret down” international human rights law to leave LGBTI people unprotected.

Madam High Commissioner, we know that you will face opposition from some States because of your leadership on these issues – as do all of us who work in this area. We encourage you to stay strong in the face of opposition, and know that LGBTI people around the globe look to you for leadership, take courage from your strength, and are inspired by your resolve. We commit our support to you and your Office in your work to face the challenges and ensure protection of the human rights of all people, without discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Endorsed by:

Akina Mama wa Afrika (Uganda)
ALITT (Argentina)
Alternatives-Cameroun (Cameroon)
ARC International (Canada/Switzerland)
ARCUS Foundation (USA)
Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health (APCOM) (Thailand/India)
Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD) (Thailand)
Asociación Líderes en Acción (Colombia)
Associação Brasileira de Gays, Lésbicas e Transgêneros (ABGLT) (Brazil)
Association for Women’s Rights in Development (AWID) (Canada/South Africa/Mexico)
Bandhu Social Welfare Society (Bangladesh)
Blue Diamond Society (Nepal)
Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network (Canada)
CEDEP (Malawi)
Center for Women’s Global Leadership
Coalition of African Lesbians (South Africa)
COC Nederland (Netherlands)
Colectivo Ovejas Negras (Uruguay)
Committee for Lesbigay Rights in Burma (CLRB) (Myanmar/Burma)
Common Language (China)
Council for Global Equality (USA)
CREA (India)
Davida (Brasil)
Egale Canada (St. Lucia/Canada)
Engender (South Africa)
EQUAL GROUND (Sri Lanka)
Euroregional Center for Public Initiative (Romania)
Fellowship of Reconciliation (USA)
Freedom and Roam Uganda (Uganda)
Frontline (Ireland)
FtM Phoenix Group (Russia)
Gay and Lesbian Activist Network for Gender Equality (GALANG) Inc. (Philippines)
GAYa NUSANTARA (Indonesia)
GayJapanNews (Japan)
Gays and Lesbians of Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)
Gender DynamiX (South Africa)
Global Advocates for Trans Equality (GATE) (USA)
Global Alliance for LGBT Education (GALE) (Netherlands)
Global Justice Ministry, Metropolitan Community Churches (USA)
Global Rights (USA)
Heartland Alliance for Human Needs & Human Rights (USA)
Helem (Lebanon)
Human Rights Education Institute of Burma (HREIB) (Myanmar/Burma)
Human Rights Watch (USA)
Humure (Burundi)
IGLHRC-LAC (Argentina/Paraguay)
ILGA (Mexico/Belgium)
Increse Nigeria (Nigeria)
INFORM human rights documentation centre (Sri Lanka)
Integrity Uganda (Uganda)
International Alliance of Women (Switzerland/International)
International Centre for Advocacy on Rights to Health (ICARH) (Nigeria)
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) (Switzerland)
International Day against Homophobia (France)
International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (USA)
International Lesbian and Gay Association (European Region) (Belgium)
International Service for Human Rights (ISHR)
Intersex South Africa (South Africa)
L’Association pour la Defense de L’Homsexualite (ADEFHO) (Cameroon)
Labrys (Kyrgyzstan)
Lambda Mozambique (Mozambique)
LBL Denmark (Denmark)
Lesbian and Gay Federation in Germany (LSVD) (Germany)
Lesbian Group Kontra (Croatia)
Lesbian Organisation of Switzerland (Switzerland)
Malta Gay Rights Movement (MGRM) (Malta)
Mama Cash (Netherlands)
Movimiento Antidiscriminatorio de Liberación (Argentina)
Mulabi (Argentina)
National MSM and HIV Policy Advocacy and Human Rights Task Force (India)
Norwegian organisation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights (Norway)
Open Society Institute (USA)
Organización de Transexuales por la Dignidad de la Diversidad (OTD) (Chile)
OUT LGBT Well-being (South Africa)
Pacific Sexual Diversity Network (Tonga)
Philippine Forum on Sports, Culture, Sexuality and Human Rights (TEAM PILIPINAS) (Philippines)
Prostitutes Interest-organisation in Norway (PION) (Norway)
Protection International (Nepal/Brussels)
Red Lésbica Cattrachas (Honduras)
Right Society (Russia)
Runa Institute (Peru)
Secret De SDHH (Argentina)
Sexual Minorities Against AIDS in Nigeria (SMAAN) (Nigeria)
Skeivt Forum (Norway)
Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD) (Guyana)
Solidarity and Action Against The HIV Infection in India (SAATHII) (India)
Spectrum Uganda Initiatives (Uganda)
Supporting Our Youth (Canada)
Suriname Men United (Suriname)
Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights (RFSL) (Sweden)
TARSHI (India)
TransColumbia (Colombia)
Transgender Network Netherlands (Netherlands)
UHAI: East African Sexual Health and Rights Initiative (Kenya)
Unitarian Universalist Association (USA)
Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR) (Philippines)
World Organisation against Torture (OMCT) (Switzerland)
Youth Coalition for Sexual Reproductive Rights (Canada)

See link of same letter at International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA) – Europe